Sometimes Sony strikes me as absolutely pathetic!
Posted: March 3rd, 2009, 3:30 pm
Actually, the main point of the Seal of Quality meant that the developer paid Nintendo the going rate, and then the game was put through tests that made sure that the game didn't contain any objectionable material(cursing, religious references, blood and gore, etc.). I do think you're right, to an extent, Oltobaz. The seal was really flimsy, though. How many bloody games, or games with cursing, actually got through? The infamous head-explosion in Bionic Commando, or Jaquio laying in a pretty deep pool of his own blood in Ninja Gaiden II, etc.
But I do think that quality had alot to do with it. Look at some of the nes's most broken games. Can anybody name any licensed games that are anywhere near as broken as, say, Action 52, the games made by Color Dreams/Wisdom Tree, etc.? The seal always caused a great deal of confusion for me.
But I do think that quality had alot to do with it. Look at some of the nes's most broken games. Can anybody name any licensed games that are anywhere near as broken as, say, Action 52, the games made by Color Dreams/Wisdom Tree, etc.? The seal always caused a great deal of confusion for me.