Texas Chainsaw Massacre (Atari 2600)

The readers post their own reviews.
m0zart1
Posts: 3117
Joined: December 31st, 1969, 7:00 pm

Texas Chainsaw Massacre (Atari 2600)

Postby m0zart1 » October 8th, 2006, 12:50 pm

Turning the Tables on Horror
 
I will just come out and say it. I HATED the story behind the horror movie "Texas Chainsaw Massacre". I found it detestable in every sense that the word can express. It is, to put it mildly, absolute, pure, in-your-face, unapologetic death and disregard for human life. I watched it, almost by accident, the first time with the sound off. I was on the phone with a friend, and it was right there, on the screen. I was doing my best to keep up my conversation with my friend without hinting to her verbally that I was being inundated with heavily disturbing images, but I couldn't seem to keep my groans to myself. I forced myself to watch it again with dialog later, but I discovered that I really didn't need to. The film IS the images of death, image after image illustrating pain, suffering and brutality.

Though my knee-jerk reaction left me regarding the story as horrid in every conceivable way, in retrospect, I couldn't help but recognize the incredible feat it was to tell it so effectively. It's as if the director was consumed by it, had to tell it just to get out of its grasp, and its domination of his life dictated that he tell it with all the passion that a good film maker would tell any story. Likewise, I note without exception that the movie both disturbed my sense of peace and kept me in a state of fear for weeks after I viewed it, to the point that it was I who was trying to escape the story's grasp. Yes, I felt assaulted just by watching it, but in the end I was unharmed, and that's precisely why horror genres intrigue me so much. They put us into situations that would in literal circumstances be unwanted and unwelcomed, assaulting our sensibilities and our boundaries at every turn, but they do it without the consequences of real violence. In that sense, this is one of the perfect horror films. I have no choice but to recognize the director for his ability, despite the awful subject matter. He painted a canvas in shades of blood, one that is quite atrocious in the watching, but his brush strokes are unquestionably brilliant.

Elements of the chainsaw wielding anti-hero of the film, known as "Leatherface", are so frightening that they have been used and reused in horror-themed video games as a device to inspire a certain doomed animalistic fear that few other icons can inspire. Game developers know that presenting an immediate need to escape from a fate worse than death, and survive the experience, is the key to captivating a player in a horror-themed game, and there are few pop culture icons that can accomplish this in quite the same way that Leatherface does. "Castlevania 64" and its prequel "Castlevania: Legacy of Darkness" for instance had a chainsaw wielding Frankenstein's monster in a hedge maze who was indestructible and always after your player character. Games as recent as "Resident Evil 4" had a chainsaw wielding hooded "Ganado" who was both terrifying, and explicitly dangerous. While these characters are clearly based on the horror that was Leatherface, there is only one game I can think of in which Leatherface made a starring appearance, and that is the notorious Atari 2600 game based explicitly on the equally notorious film. Unfortunately, his first video game appearance was one in which his real value to scare like no other was virtually wasted.

The opening screen is actually pretty menacing. The title "Texas Chainsaw Massacre" flashes like an ominous neon sign, accompanied by an electrical sound burst at each light up. That's where the terror ends, for the most part. What made the film so utterly frightening was that we can identify with those teenagers trying to escape from one of the most hopeless situations ever put to celluloid in the form of Leatherface and his menacing family of cannibals, but that conflict has been turned on its head in the game. You see, in this game, you aren't playing as the poor unfortunate teenagers who happened to drive through this god forsaken Texas town, but as Leatherface himself. With the house of horror looming in the distance, your job is to chase those screaming teens and mow them down with your chainsaw. This move was obviously intended to satisfy that sadistic side that the developers assumed we all have hidden in our personalities, but as the game focused on the sadism of turning innocents into hamburger meat, it robbed it of all the "fight or flight" sweat and tears that the movie was literally drenched with.

Putting the focus of the gameplay aside for a moment, the gameplay mechanics themselves are also pretty flawed. As you are chasing after teens, you will have to navigate around many objects which will try to block your path. Among these will be stationary objects like fences, cow skulls, and brush. These will all stop you in your path for a while, delaying your pursuit of prey. Brush will actually delay you indefinitely, requiring you to run your chainsaw to finally break from its grasp. Along with stationary objects are the moving wheelchairs rolling at you from time to time, which will also delay you for a significant period of time. These annoying roadblocks are almost unavoidable regardless of your dexterity, and make the game somewhat frustrating. Another constraint is that you have a fuel tank for your chainsaw, which you must watch carefully. It slowly runs out regardless of what you do, but really starts to burn when you press the Atari joystick's fire button, which activates your chainsaw for a moment. By itself, the fact that there is this time and resource restriction wouldn't be debilitating, but the fact that your fuel meter cannot be refilled (outside of using up another of your three lives) makes any game last only a few minutes, regardless of how well you play it.

The graphical presentation isn't terrible given the Atari 2600's limitations. Leatherface looks reasonably like his on-screen counterpart, including his chainsaw. Teenagers at least look like human beings, albeit short, pudgy ones. The horror house in the background distance moves along the horizon as expected more slowly than objects that obstruct your path, and none of the objects that block you are indiscernible to what they actually are, as in most Atari 2600 games. While graphics aren't lacking, sound effects are terrible. Like the movie, the game is absent of notable tunes. The chainsaw makes interesting sound effects, but the high-pitched beeps you are subjected to when a teenage victim appears are inexcusable. These are supposed to represent their "screams", but it's more hurtful to the ears than to the conscience.

This game was subject to an immediate cabal of censorship. So thorough was this attempt that many Atari aficionados in its heyday never even knew it existed. The game's premise of playing the murderous villain from the movie was so controversial that it led to the games being pulled from almost every retail shelf in a matter of days after its release. While I hate that the long arm of censorship had something to do with the demise of the game, I am more saddened by the rights we lost in the sad affair than I am in the loss of this particular game. Admittedly, I am no fan of games that focus on playable characters who murder innocent people, but my objections to the formula go beyond the ethical and into the aesthetic. Consider that "Texas Chainsaw Massacre" was made by the same company that brought us one of the first very well-executed and genuinely tense horror game based on a movie. That game, "Halloween", has you playing as the heroin of the film, attempting to save yourself and the children you are babysitting from a cool calm serial killer, and could be described as reasonably tense and frightening BECAUSE your objective was to escape the killer. That this game attempts to turn the tables on that formula and puts the player in the role of the villain himself might have been a disturbing first for the industry, but it wasn't in the least frightening, and that's what good horror games should be about.

Alienblue

Texas Chainsaw Massacre (Atari 2600)

Postby Alienblue » October 9th, 2006, 7:33 am

Review Of A review (C)

I love reading your classic reviews, but if I may be a bit critical here, (I minored in english) , you really have to cut down on the stuff-EDIT it!- that isn't really associated with the videogame. You spent so much time talking about the FILM, the iconic references to CHAINSAWS, and such that I could not even quite understand if you even LIKED this game. More to the point, like " TCM is a terrible 2600 game that is only weakly linked to the horror movie of the same name. It plays like a watered down, horizontal FROGGER, in which you must avoid wheelchairs and tornbushes while trying to "hop" onto people and kill them. The sound is barely there, graphics are weak and the game is a HORROR allright, but only because it is NO FUN!-D-!" -there, see? Short and to the point. Good luck on your next review!

m0zart1
Posts: 3117
Joined: December 31st, 1969, 7:00 pm

Texas Chainsaw Massacre (Atari 2600)

Postby m0zart1 » October 9th, 2006, 2:10 pm

[QUOTE=Alienblue]Review Of A review (C)

I love reading your classic reviews, but if I may be a bit critical here, (I minored in english) , you really have to cut down on the stuff-EDIT it!- that isn't really associated with the videogame. You spent so much time talking about the FILM, the iconic references to CHAINSAWS, and such that I could not even quite understand if you even LIKED this game. More to the point, like " TCM is a terrible 2600 game that is only weakly linked to the horror movie of the same name. It plays like a watered down, horizontal FROGGER, in which you must avoid wheelchairs and tornbushes while trying to "hop" onto people and kill them. The sound is barely there, graphics are weak and the game is a HORROR allright, but only because it is NO FUN!-D-!" -there, see? Short and to the point. Good luck on your next review![/QUOTE]

Thanks for the advice.  I really mean it.

 

I don't really intend to defend myself here, per se, but I do feel like I should justify my position in regards to reviews.  I like both reviews that very wordy, and I like reviews that stay within a short paragraph (like the VGC does his).  Sometimes I want to know more than can be in a short paragraph.  Sometimes I want to express more.  I fact, most of the time I want to express more than I can in a paragraph.

 

With this review in particular, I wanted to express that the movie is definitely scarey, and that Leatherface-like elements have been used successfully in other games, but that in this game, ironically, it just doesn't work out that way.  Playing "as" Leatherface is in no way frightening.  I also wanted to provide my reasoning behind it.  What is it that led up to my thinking this way.  In other words, what is the foundation for my argument.

 

I don't think that it's always sufficient to just say "I think A and B, oh and here's C also."  It doesn't work for most people.  In fact, I've come to prefer just reading a long review's content than looking at simple grades or scores.  It is almost impossible for a single reviewer to be able to field what I might be concerned about in a single paraphraph, or even worse, in a single score or grade.  We are too individualistic a people for that.  A lengthy review, however, can tell me exactly why this reviewer didn't like a game.  Maybe I disagree with what brought it down in his eyes?  Likely, I wouldn't have obtained that in a single paragraph.

 

So in this review, I wanted to say that the movie scared me witless, and other games with "chainsaw massacre" scared me witless.  I wanted to say why they scare me witless, and why this game doesn't.  So that's what I did.  I doubt that review style will be for everybody, but single paragraph reviews aren't for everybody either.


Conn

Texas Chainsaw Massacre (Atari 2600)

Postby Conn » October 9th, 2006, 3:38 pm

Persoanlly, m0zart, I loved your review. You made it both long and interesting, which I really like. I love to see elaborations on [i]why[/i] things are great or not. Single-paragraph reviews are nice because I can read a lot of them quickly, but sometimes they just aren't enough.

MY only suggestion? Add in a paragraph at the bottom to sum up the entire review (and a note at the start saying this). Obviously this isn't for people like me, but rather for people who don't like long reviews. I do something similar in my reviews, because I feel I ramble a bit too much, but can't get myself to cut the length.

Alienblue

Texas Chainsaw Massacre (Atari 2600)

Postby Alienblue » October 10th, 2006, 6:55 am

Well, I can understand both points of veiw. In my reviews, like in sonic collection, I certainly go in-depth on THE GAME, but I try not to get off track, talking about Sonic's history, comparisson to the Genesis "experiance" and so on.... but that can get ME in trouble too, since sometimes I leave out too much and people end up asking me questions! So I guess we both learned something....

BTW I love your classic reviews, really-you did PING PONG, how about a nod to TANK/COMBAT next? I never felt that got the attention it deserved....

nixontech2071

Texas Chainsaw Massacre (Atari 2600)

Postby nixontech2071 » April 6th, 2008, 4:41 pm

Ive seen the AVGN special for this, and the "beeping" sound was the
most hilarious and stupid sound ever!

Anonymous Prime

Texas Chainsaw Massacre (Atari 2600)

Postby Anonymous Prime » April 6th, 2008, 5:42 pm

Mozart, reading this was like reading a college thesis on a classic piece of literature. It was actually a really entertaining read, but I have to admit that it's funny you dove so deep into it, especially since it's a bunch of beeps, boops, blobs, and pixels. So you said the game was pulled from store shelves...does this mean it is somewhat of a rarity?

ALIENBLUE1
Posts: 18
Joined: December 31st, 1969, 7:00 pm

Texas Chainsaw Massacre (Atari 2600)

Postby ALIENBLUE1 » April 7th, 2008, 1:23 pm

HEY YOU #$%@#$@*.....OOOOOO AM I MAD!

THAT IS NOT ME!

WHO IS USING MY NAME? If I could delete all of that I would. Someone KNOWS me is hiding behind me. I did minor in English, but I DID NOT WRITE ANY OF THE ABOVE RESPONSES!!!!!!

J.H.Christ,Man, have the GUTS to put your OWN NAME on your posts!
I have never seen the movie or played the game and cannot and WILL not comment.

VGC.....can you delete the above? Anyway to tell THIS ANGRY DUDE IS THE REAL ALIENBLUE!!!!????? Grrrrr.....

knox

Texas Chainsaw Massacre (Atari 2600)

Postby knox » April 7th, 2008, 1:33 pm

Alien, those post are 2 years old, for crying out loud!

Its Nixon fault for bumping all these old topics!



m0zart1
Posts: 3117
Joined: December 31st, 1969, 7:00 pm

Texas Chainsaw Massacre (Atari 2600)

Postby m0zart1 » April 7th, 2008, 2:58 pm

[QUOTE=ALIENBLUE]HEY YOU #$%@#$@*.....OOOOOO AM I MAD!

THAT IS NOT ME![/QUOTE]

Hehe those posts are you Alien, they were just from several years ago.  Someone bumped the topic, basically.  Not that I mind, of course, being that it was my review



Return to “Reader Reviews”