3DO Reviews F-L

Here's an unlikely gem for the 3DO system - the video game adaption of a long-running game show. Premiering way back in 1976 (!), Family Feud peaked in popularity during the 80's when it was hosted by the charming Richard Dawson. Richard always made it a point to kiss all of the lady contestants. Sadly, he is not in this game. The contestants include four ethnically-diverse families. You'd think this would be a great party game, but it only supports two players (using one controller). Playing involves naming the most popular answers to random survey questions like "name something that goes very fast" or "give me a word you might hear on the golf course." If one family can't guess all the answers, the other family can "steal". The unpredictable questions pretty much run the gamut. While playing this with my wife I nervously fumbled through "name a gift that will soothe a wife's ruffled feathers". Certain questions show their age, like "name something you wish you could quit doing right now". The number one answer? Smoking! The intuitive user interface makes it a breeze to enter letters, erase, and register your final answer. And you don't even need to be exact! "Diamonds" will count as "jewelry", and "doctor" gives you credit as "physician". The CPU opponent isn't too bright but it sure is fun to watch him type in his letters so fast! The television-style presentation follows the format of the show. The music sounds hokey and the digitized families act like they're winning or losing. There's very little fluff so the action moves along at a nice brisk pace. I'm still a little fuzzy on the rules. There are times when I really felt like I should have won, but lost. Even so, Family Feud is a fun game with universal appeal. It's hard to find a decent working copy of this game but if you do, you're in for a treat. © Copyright 2016 The Video Game Critic.

This ambitious title puts you in the ring as Muhammad Ali, boxing other big (and not so big) names including Joe Frazier and Leon Spinks. These 3D graphics must have been incredible in 1995. The boxers are composed of polygons with bitmapped textures, and they look terrific. Foes of Ali attempts to be as realistic as possible, which is both good and bad. The fights are much like they are in real life, with fighters that come out strong but are dead tired by the third round. One aspect that the game doesn't convey well is Ali's ability to dance around - these guys are all pretty slow. While sweat and blood flies for solid blows, the hits in general don't appear to be too devastating. And when the fighters clench (hug), it just looks silly. Foes of Ali scores big in the options department. You have total control over the boxing rules (rounds, scoring, judges) and game options (difficulty, blood, screen info). There are 21 camera angles to choose from, but most are worthless and some are utterly ridiculous. Each round is scored realistically by three judges. The game has its moments, and I managed to stage some exciting late-round comebacks. But as your fighter wears out, the controls become less responsive, which makes sense but isn't exactly fun. A few other glaring flaws ruined this game for me. First, the fighters tend to regain almost all of their energy between rounds, which is ludicrous. But what pissed me off worse was that worthless energy meter. With any other boxing game, these meters would indicate how close a fighter was to going down. But in this game, fighters can go down with plenty of energy left. On the flip side, fighters can keep fighting long after their energy has depleted! Does that make any sense at all? Foes of Ali definitely has a good look, but the gameplay leaves much to be desired. © Copyright 2002 The Video Game Critic.

In 1995, every console wanted a mascot, so we saw a lot of games featuring personable little animals. It was at this time that Gex, a comical green lizard, made his bid to be the 3DO representative. Although Gex never became a household name, this platform game was critically acclaimed. I can't deny that this is a high quality title with superb graphics, remarkable sound, and good variety. The stages are well-designed, colorful, and loaded with large animated characters. Gex is easy to control, and can execute such moves as the tail whip, tongue lash, hurl, and wall stick. The tail whip is his standard attack. The tongue lash lets him snag power-ups, which give him the power to hurl fire or ice balls. But Gex's real claim to fame is his ability to stick to walls and ceilings. We've seen this is some older games (Sonic and Knuckles come to mind), but never to this extent. The climbing aspect really adds a new dimension. You can choose which levels you want to play via Mario-like map screens. There are four sub-areas: the graveyard, Toontown, Kung-fu-ville, and the jungle. My favorite is the graveyard, which features lizard zombies, flying demons, and chainsaw-toting psychopaths. Gex features all the obligatory platform elements, including destructible walls, hidden areas, checkpoints, portals, springboards, and floating platforms. But Gex has a depth of play rarely seen in this type of game. For example, you can tail-whip floating skulls into your enemies. There are multiple paths through each stage and challenging mini games as well. Every level throws new surprises at you, and the bosses do not disappoint either. It's pretty rare that the sound effects stand out in a video game, but I definitely took notice of them in Gex. Effects like the whipping sound of his tail and enemies getting knocked like bowling pins are crystal clear and entertaining. Unfortunately I've never been a big fan of Dana Gould who does Gex's voice, and I found his quips to be mildly amusing but mostly annoying. You can save your game, but only at predetermined points. Overall, I'd have to say that Gex is one of the premiere 3DO games. Crystal Dynamics tried to create the ultimate 2D platform game, and they did a pretty good job. © Copyright 2002 The Video Game Critic.

This is one of those combat strategy games where you move a party of warriors around a map and engage in turn-based combat against monsters. It's similar to Vandal Hearts (Playstation, 1997) and Final Fantasy Tactics (Playstation, 1997), but not nearly as good. Guardian War features pseudo-3D, cartoonish sprites, but close camera angles make everything look chunky and pixelated. Upon entering a new territory, you must destroy a certain number of creatures to clear the map and move on. You'll navigate the countryside using your main character, but once a confrontation occurs, the other members of your party appear. Certain warriors are well suited for close-range sword fighting, but others like clerics can attack from a distance and heal other members of the party. Sitting through the mediocre attack animations gets tiresome though. There's some strategy involved in positioning your characters, but there's no concept of directional attacks, and all fighting is done on a level playing field (literally). The shoulder buttons let you rotate the camera by 90 degrees, but the low angle makes it hard to gauge your position with respect to other creatures. The strategic possibilities expand as you collect additional items and abilities, but it's slow and boring in the early going. The menu interface is reasonable, and it's nice how you can select a "defensive posture" when you're just trying to buy some time. Hitting one button brings up the prompt "Load ok?" and I never knew what the hell that meant. You can save your progress between stages. Guardian War's cut-scenes are poorly produced, and I could barely even make out what the narrator was saying. This game was probably pretty innovative back in 1994, but the genre has made huge strides since then, turning Guardian War into a long-lost relic. © Copyright 2007 The Video Game Critic.

Hell is a point-and-click adventure that's just weird enough to be compelling. It's set in a future dystopian Washington DC that's linked to Hell. The opening credits boast big-name actors like Dennis Hopper and Grace Jones, giving the game instant street cred. Like many early CD titles Hell uses pre-rendered 3D graphics that were once amazing but now look strangely off putting. The character models are stiff, ill-proportioned, and poorly lip-synched. Still, it's that awkward quality that makes the visuals so fascinating. You control a married police officer couple who narrowly escapes an attack by government forces. The man is a wise-cracking smartass with a voice like Beck Bennet. Together they must piece together clues to determine why "The Hand" wants then dead. You hop between locations via a nifty wireframe map with real locations like McPherson Square, Dupont Circle, and even the Pentagon. Each contains creepy, shadowy areas populated by colorful characters, androids, and demons. You travel to Hell itself several times, but it looks suspiciously like Earth! The point-and-click interface lets you point where you want to go, but the round-about paths your people take are almost comical. Whenever you strike up a conversation you'll want to get comfortable, because the conversations go on and on, causing my 3DO to grind like mad. There's one creature who flails his arms when he rants, like a demonic Bernie Sanders. Although clever and funny at times, the dialog is so wordy and repetitive it's hard to maintain interest much less glean any clues. Even the scenery is hard to discern since it's so dark and indistinct. The few action sequences are played out automatically. During one scene I expected to be killed by a demon, only to watch my peeps pull out weapons and start firing! It's very easy to get stuck, partly because manipulating items is inordinately complicated. Still, I enjoyed the psychedelic atmosphere that pervades the game. The music is sparse but eerie, punctuated by alarming sounds. Hell is remarkably forward-thinking for a 1993 title, touching upon modern topics like artificial birth techniques, ubiquitous newsfeeds, virtual porn, and people downloading their consciousness to a computer. Oddball games like Hell are the reason we play the 3DO. It's not a bad title to mellow out to, providing the lights are turned low and there's a stiff drink in your hand. © Copyright 2019 The Video Game Critic.

This kind of 3DO game gets on my nerves. You "learn" as you play, and have to invest an inordinate time figuring out what's going on. I gave it a chance, but I think it was a waste of time. The premise of Immercenary is that you're the subject in an experiment to enter a virtual world to save mankind. When you make the "jump" to this virtual world called "Perfect", you find yourself in a city loaded with strange buildings, power-ups, and strange, zombie-like beings. What ensues is probably the slowest and most repetitive first person shooter I've ever witnessed. There are protective "portals" scattered all over that replenish your defense, offense, and agility. Until you learn how to use these, you'll die continuously. Portals also allow you to talk to these bizarre (and sometimes half naked) creatures, which is how you'll learn what the heck's going on around you. Your ultimate goal is to advance in rank from 255 to 1 by blowing away creatures and facing bosses. It took me quite a while to figure all this out, because the instructions really suck. Immercenary does feature some nifty visual effects and shapely babes, but it's mostly a slow, plodding ordeal. You're agility meter drains quickly as you run, so you'll constantly have to "rest". Resting is just like it sounds - you sit there and watch your meter recharge slowly (what genius came up with this idea?). Once you start moving, the peculiar control scheme keeps you moving forward like car, and you need to press both shoulder buttons to stop (weird!). Dying returns you to the lab, where the pissed-off scientists look at you like you've just interrupted their coffee break. The game never seems to end, even when you do poorly. Once I died on purpose, only to have a scientist at the lab say "Definite improvement in target kill ratio - that's good!", before sending my sorry ass back into this virtual hell. Immercenary tries to be a thinking man's Doom, but the payoff isn't nearly worth the investment. © Copyright 2002 The Video Game Critic.

This was a landmark football game. In 1994 me and my friends drooled over screenshots of 3DO's Madden in magazines, which were unbelievable for the time. With digitized sprites and actual video clips, this stood as the best Madden game from 1994 all the way until the recent Playstation 2 editions. Being a fan of old-school football games, I instantly fell in love with the TV-style presentation and the simple but fun gameplay. As you begin each contest, John Madden welcomes you from the booth and introduces the teams. Yes, his comments are generic and canned ("Okay, here's the kickoff, everyone should be ready."), but they still add something. The gameplay is outstanding. Players look almost photographic, and the animation is relatively smooth. I found the running and passing games to be fairly well-balanced. The running moves are effective, and your runningback usually won't go down on the first hit. I was surprised to see that this game uses the old-style passing windows, which I was never crazy about. There are video clips of referees and fans intermingled with the action. I love it when the "chains" are brought out to measure first downs. John Madden's commentary is pretty amusing. He always scolds you for using timeouts: "Just remember that timeout you took - it's gonna come back to haunt you". I love this game, but I can't ignore a few problems. First, the video clips in the "scouting report" section don't always jive with the text on the screen. Next, the snow is LAME. It's very light, and doesn't even lie on the field. Also, a skill level option would have been nice; I found this game to be a bit on the easy side. There are a few other minor issues, like when my receiver caught a touchdown, and then lined up to kick the extra point. What a versatile guy! Still, if you prefer classic sprite-based Madden action, it doesn't get much better than this. © Copyright 2001 The Video Game Critic.