3DO Reviews G-L

In 1995, every console wanted a mascot so we got an invasion of cute little animals "with attitude". It was the perfect time for Gex, a comical green lizard, to make his bid to represent the 3DO. Gex never became a household name but this 2D platformer achieved critical acclaim. You can't deny this is a high-quality title with superb graphics, remarkable sound, and good variety. The stages are well-designed and loaded with oversized characters.

Gex is easy to control, with novel moves such as his tail whip, tongue lash, hurl, and wall-stick. The tail whip is his standard attack. The tongue lash lets him snag power-ups, allowing him to hurl fire or ice balls. But Gex's true claim-to-fame is his ability to stick to walls and ceilings. We've seen this in certain older games like Sonic & Knuckles (Genesis, 1993) but never to this extent. The climbing really adds a new dimension.

You can choose which levels you want to play via Mario-like map screens. There are four sub-areas: the graveyard, Toontown, Kung-fu-ville, and the jungle. My favorite is the graveyard, featuring lizard zombies, flying demons, and chainsaw-toting psychopaths. Gex includes all the obligatory platform elements like destructible walls, checkpoints, portals, springboards, and floating platforms. But Gex has more technique, multiple paths, and even mini games. Every level throws new surprises at you and the bosses do not disappoint either.

The audio effects in Gex also get plenty of attention. The sound of his tail whip and enemies getting knocked down like bowling pins are crystal clear and entertaining. Unfortunately I've never been a big fan of Gex's voice. His frequent quips are mildly amusing but mostly annoying. You can save your game, but only at predetermined points. Crystal Dynamics clearly put a lot of effort into this, and as a result Gex is one of the premiere 3DO titles of all time. © Copyright 2002 The Video Game Critic.

This is one of those combat/strategy games where assemble a party of warriors and engage in turn-based battles. While it sports similarities to Vandal Hearts (Playstation, 1997) and Final Fantasy Tactics (Playstation, 1997), Guardian War is not nearly as good. Its cartoonish sprites are rendered in a pseudo-3D style, but the close camera angles make everything look chunky and pixelated. Upon entering a new territory you must destroy a certain number of creatures to clear the map and progress. You'll navigate the countryside using your main character but once a confrontation occurs the other members of your party magically appear.

Certain warriors are well-suited for close-range sword fighting, while others like clerics can attack from a distance and heal the party. Sitting through the mediocre attack animations gets tiresome though. There's some strategy involved in positioning your characters but there's no concept of directional attacks. All the fighting is done on a level playing field - literally! The shoulder buttons allow you to rotate the camera by 90 degrees, but the low angle makes it hard to gauge your position with respect to others. Strategic possibilities expand as you collect additional items and abilities, but it's slow and boring early on.

The menu interface is well designed and it's nice how you can assume a "defensive posture" when you're trying to buy some time. Hitting one button brings up the prompt "Load ok?" and I never knew what the hell that meant. You can save your progress between stages. Guardian War's cut-scenes are poorly produced and I could barely even make out what the narrator was saying. This game was probably pretty innovative back in 1994, but as the genre has made huge strides Guardian War is looking like a long-lost relic. © Copyright 2007 The Video Game Critic.

Hell is a point-and-click adventure that's just twisted and weird enough to be compelling. It's set in a future dystopian Washington DC that's linked to Hell. The opening credits boast big-name actors like Dennis Hopper and Grace Jones, giving the game instant street cred. As with many early CD titles, Hell uses pre-rendered 3D graphics. While once cutting-edge, they now appear strangely off-putting, with stiff, ill-proportioned, poorly lip-synched character models. Still, it's that awkward quality that makes the visuals so fascinating today.

You control a police officer who narrowly escapes an attack by government forces. He's a wise-cracking smartass with a voice like Beck Bennet. Along with his wife he must piece together clues to determine why "The Hand" wants them dead. You hop between locations via a nifty wireframe map with real locations like McPherson Square, Dupont Circle, and even the Pentagon. Each contains creepy, shadowy areas populated by colorful characters, androids, and demons. You travel to Hell itself several times, but it looks suspiciously like Earth!

The point-and-click interface lets you point where you want to go, but the round-about paths your character takes are almost comical. Upon striking up a conversation you'll want to get comfortable, because they tend to go on and on, causing my 3DO to grind like mad. One creature flails his arms as he rants, like a demonic Bernie Sanders. Although clever and funny at times, the dialog is so wordy and repetitive it's hard to maintain interest, much less glean clues. Even the scenery is hard to discern as it's so dark and indistinct. Some of the key action sequences play out automatically. During one I expected to be killed by a demon, only to witness my peeps pull out automatic weapons and start firing!

It's easy to get stuck in the game, partly because manipulating items is inordinately complicated. Still, I enjoyed the psychedelic atmosphere. The music is sparse but eerie, punctuated by alarming sounds. Hell is remarkably forward-thinking for a 1993 title, touching upon modern topics like artificial birth techniques, ubiquitous newsfeeds, virtual porn, and people downloading their consciousnesses. Oddball titles like Hell are a good reason to still play the 3DO. © Copyright 2019 The Video Game Critic.

I'm trying to understand the thought process behind Icebreaker. Many classic puzzle games are predicated on the notion of manipulating shapes like squares (Tetris) or circles (Bust a Move). What about triangles? There's gotta be a way to squeeze some fun out of those things, right? Perhaps not. Icebreaker proves a game needs to be organically fun; you can't force the issue.

Icebreaker offers a massive grid of 150 selectable levels. Each level presents a screen full of upright triangles (referred to as "pyramids" in the instructions) of various colors. You guide a white triangle that travels around the screen on its side. The screen scrolls a bit in all directions. Your goal is to clear the other triangles.

You can shoot red triangles and plow right through blue ones which shatter like glass. Little yellow triangles emerge from the edges of the screen, converging on your location. Shoot them. Black pyramids can only be destroyed by leading the yellow triangles into them. As you progress the levels incorporate environmental hazards like green toxic waste. Making contact with just about anything (except blue triangles) is fatal.

The problem is, you don't have much room to work with. You're placed in the middle of a triangle minefield that's both cramped and unforgiving. Bull, meet China Shop! One slip-up and you'll have to restart the entire level - with all the triangles restored! Once I successfully cleared 41 triangles but when I tried to reposition myself to shoot the final red one I accidentally brushed up against it and died. This kind of stuff happens all the time.

The yellow triangles that chase you around are just a nuisance. They typically move directly into your line of fire, but you can't aim at them without moving in their direction. Therefore it's necessary to first move away from them to make enough space to turn and fire. Doing this over and over feels like busy work.

The three-quarter viewpoint offers lousy depth perspective, and clumsy controls don't help. You're required to make a lot of diagonal movements, but the 3DO controller isn't conducive to that. While trying to "find" that diagonal there's a good chance you'll rub up against something and die.

At the very least Icebreaker could have displayed a simple counter of remaining triangles to give the player a sense of progression. I'm pretty sure this was designed on the back of a cocktail napkin after too many drinks. It's one of those abstract games where you expect the fun to kick in at any time, but it never does. © Copyright 2024 The Video Game Critic.

My first experience playing Immercenary was not great but I decided to give it another shot. Its production values are certainly impressive enough. Electronic Arts was truly pushing the limits of gaming in the mid-90s. Immercenary opens with some FMV of an intergalactic babe in a provocative outfit babbling on about virtual reality or armageddon or something.

Next you see three scientists in a futuristic lab gathered around some poor chump strapped to a chair like Total Recall. Apparently Mr. Number Four just got his mind getting fried during some virtual reality trip. Just your luck, your name happens to be Number Five. The game makes good use of comic book-style cells to jazz up the cut-scenes.

During the actual game you're transported several times to the virtual realm of "Perfect". It's a dreamlike, surreal world that looks like a city with angular, zombie-like beings wandering around. The action is played from a first-person view and the frame-rate is impressively smooth as you glide across the ground.

I thought I was getting the hang of this game, walking around blasting "rithm" creatures to bits. They leave a fuzzy essence behind that you can pass through and absorb. Three colored bars indicate your vital signs (offense, defense, agility), and at least one is always running low. Camping out at colored "spires" help you reconstitute these. Outside of maintaining these levels, the objectives are cryptic at best.

Apparently your ultimate goal is to advance in rank from 255 to 1 by destroying creatures and defeating bosses. It took me quite a while to figure this out because the instructions are terrible. Everything in the manual is described using pretentious, inscrutable jargon. It's so bad EA had to include a second instruction manual for "new recruits".

Why does everything have to be so convoluted? When you find a power-up, it's not readily available. Nope, you have to assign it to a button via your inventory menu. Even when I seemed to be doing everything right, I would suddenly find myself transported back to the lab. What's going on?

Each time you return the scientists appear more annoyed and demoralized. In one case I died on purpose, only to have a scientist praise my performance ("Definite improvement in target kill ratio - that's good!") before sending my sorry ass back into that virtual hell.

I've seen people claim they enjoy this game so it's quite possible I'm missing the boat here. I just wish the game didn't throw you to the wolves at the outset. I never know where to go or what to do. When I die, I rarely not know why or how it happened. All I do know is that I care less and less. © Copyright 2025 The Video Game Critic.

In 1994 this was a landmark football game. My friends and I would drool over screenshots of 3DO's Madden in magazines, which looked unbelievable for the time. With digitized sprites and actual video clips, this stood as the ultimate Madden game all the way until the Playstation 2 era. As a fan of old-school football games I instantly fell in love with its TV-style presentation and the simple-yet-fun gameplay. Each contest begins with John Madden welcoming you from the booth and introducing the teams. Yes, his comments are generic and canned ("Okay, here's the kickoff, everyone should be ready.") but his mere presence makes it feel like NFL football.

The gameplay is outstanding. Players look stunning and the animation is impressively smooth. I found the running and passing games to be fairly well-balanced. The running moves are effective, and your running back usually won't go down on the first hit. I was surprised to see the game uses the old-style passing windows, which I was never a big fan of. Video clips of referees and fans are intermingled with the action, and I love it when the "chains" are brought out to measure first downs. John Madden's commentary is pretty amusing. He always scolds you for using timeouts: "Just remember that time-out you took; it's gonna come back to haunt you".

As much as I love this game I have to mention a few issues. The video clips in the "scouting report" section don't always jive with the text on the screen. The snow is so lame you can barely even see it on the field. Finally, a skill level option would have been nice, as I found the game is a bit on the easy side. Some of its quirks are endearing, like when my receiver caught a touchdown and proceeded to line up to kick the extra point. Now that's what I call versatility! If you prefer classic sprite-based Madden action, it doesn't get much better than this. © Copyright 2001 The Video Game Critic.

There's a scene from the Jurassic Park movie where the girl taking the tour of the park finds a small screen in the automated vehicle. "It's an interactive CD-ROM! You just touch the right part of the screen and it talks about whatever you want!" Here she is in the midst of actual live dinosaurs extinct for a million years, and she's more excited about reading about them on a tiny screen? Maybe that was the idea behind Jurassic Park Interactive: the CD-ROM nobody wanted.

The promising video intro incorporates a few scenes from the movie, most notably the memorable clip of the helicopter approaching the lush tropical island. The sweeping orchestrated theme really got me in the mood for adventure, but I was thrown for a loop as the characters were being introduced. Wait a minute; that's not Dr. Grant! That's not Ellie Sadler! These characters look nothing like the real actors! Not even close! You can't just slap some glasses on a fat white guy and call him Nedry!

Your goal is to transport people located around the island to safety via first-person mini-games. One recreates the exciting scene where the jeep is being chased by a marauding T-Rex. This stage makes clever use of the "objects closer than they appear" mirror. The driving controls use the directional pad to accelerate and shoulder buttons to steer. It seems backwards but makes more sense when you realize you're not so much steering as swerving around debris in the road.

Another stage has you zapping Dilophosauruses dashing between trees. You may recall it was these "spitting" dinosaurs that did Nedry in. Then there's the scary raptor stage, which I never made it through. You're stuck in a dark, maze-like power station in search of keys. The heart-pounding action is pretty intense but also disorienting to the point of frustration. Finally, there's a set of cheesy computer-themed games like a Space Invader clone that substitutes aliens with digitized faces, and an Asteroids-style shooter where you blast rotating floppy disks.

I'll give Interactive points for presentation. It does make you feel as if you're in a Jurassic Park environment. There are some nice digitized graphics and things can get intense at times. But the hodge-podge game design doesn't really work. Even if you enjoy one or two of these mini-games, you have to play them over and over again, and they get old in a hurry. © Copyright 2023 The Video Game Critic.

Ugh! I've played some bad first-person shooters in my time, but this one is particularly painful! Killing Time is a violent game with an occult theme and bizarre creatures. It tries to be as gory, weird, and over-the-top as possible, but it's just irritating! The scenery is a boring, pixelated mess. Every now and then some full-motion video "ghosts" are superimposed on the screen. They look great, but only serve as eye-candy, not improving the lackluster gameplay. The control is absolutely atrocious. You movements are too jumpy to aim or look around easily, and strafing tends to get you hung up on the walls. The digitized enemies don't look bad, but your shots don't always register, even when your shot is dead-on. Killing Time is a nightmare. I hate it. Don't be deceived by the nice-looking screen shots on the box! © Copyright 2001 The Video Game Critic.

This light gun title claims to be "one or two player action". Heck, if you even own one of the 3DO light guns consider yourself lucky. Last Bounty Hunter is not the sci-fi shooter you were hoping for. It's just another Mad Dog McCree (American Laser Games, 1993) style western, following the same tired formula lock-step.

After an easy intro sequence you can select between four villains to apprehend. The footage just screams "low-budget" with actors trying hard to check off all the wild west stereotype boxes. Each scene has a brief set-up which often tries to catch you off-guard. You can't shoot anybody until they point a gun at you, but sometimes it's hard to see what's happening, especially in a crowded bar. The fuzzy video quality doesn't help.

It is mildly fun to pick off outlaws and watch them throw themselves into fountains, tumble over casino tables, and fall off horses. The audio and video tends to move in fits and stops as semi-randomized sequences load in a not-so-seamless fashion. Innocents can pop up in the same places as bad guys, so watch that itchy trigger finger.

Knowing where to shoot is not always obvious but you learn as you go. The gun accuracy is actually pretty good, as you can even hit the edge of the screen with ease. Distant targets are tough to hit, so fire two or three shots for good measure. Sometimes you'll clearly miss a guy and see him go down, and other times you'll hit a guy dead-on and it won't register. When you lose a life a doctor or caretaker tosses out irreverent wisecracks at your expense.

The Last Bounty Hunter is more of the same shallow light gun action we've come to expect on the 3DO. The storyline seems incoherent as you're whisked from one wild west location to the next. I noticed that the audio track would occasionally get out of sync with action. Fortunately it doesn't dampen the fun very much, mainly because there's not much fun to be had. © Copyright 2022 The Video Game Critic.