Castlevania series (1986-1995)

The readers post their own reviews.
User avatar
Stalvern
Posts: 2553
Joined: June 18th, 2016, 7:15 pm

Castlevania series (1986-1995)

Postby Stalvern » December 11th, 2025, 2:46 pm

I've been on a real Classicvania kick this past couple of weeks, thanks to the Dominus Collection review, and I've decided to get my thoughts on one of my favorite series down once and for all. I respect the Metroidvanias for the achievements they are but don't enjoy them nearly as much, so I will not be covering them in this thread, nor will I get into the installments on the original Game Boy or the 3D games.

Without further ado...

Image

Castlevania (1986)

What can I say about this masterpiece? It hit the Famicom two months after Ghosts 'n' Goblins and immediately made that game a relic; it sprang forth from Konami's forehead in full glory. The worst that can be said about it is that it's quite short, being such an early release, but everything it does is done brilliantly.

The coolest thing about it, the thing that makes it Castlevania, is Simon Belmont. His fixed jump arc and the delay in his whip animation work in harmony to give the gameplay a rhythmic, forceful, fateful character, a special hybrid of Ninja Gaiden's immediacy and Prince of Persia's detachment (and before both of those games). With every action, there is planning, anticipation, and inevitable finality – each intercepted Medusa head is a prophecy and its fulfillment in one. If that were changed, the result would be a very normal NES action game with little unique beyond its atmosphere and general polish. If everything else were changed while keeping the control mechanics, it would still unmistakably be Castlevania. People who are allergic to using their brains often call the control "dated" because they do not want to think about how and when they move or attack. They do not find joy in this dance, and they do not deserve its beauty.

But the coolest thing about Castlevania is the level design. Constrained by the system's hardware, early NES platform games generally scroll on only one axis and accordingly have level design built along that axis. (Ghosts 'n' Goblins and Super Pitfall are notable exceptions and notably simplistic.) Super Mario Bros. lets you go right. Kid Icarus lets you go up. Metroid lets you go right or up, or left or down, but always through a tight shaft or tunnel. Castlevania, despite having no vertical scrolling (outside one hilarious cutscene), uses its characteristic stairways to connect sections above and below and give the stages a strong vertical character, especially in levels 2 and 3. Traveling through Dracula's castle, the player climbs up through its inner structure and then ascends its outer walls, giving the game a sense of great scale despite its actual brevity. Just as important to that sense of scale is the sheer variety of environments – these heights are followed immediately by the underground river, whose claustrophobic confines are defined by low ceilings and dangerous waters below, in turn followed by a barren field of ruins under a gantlet of marauding birds and hunchbacks. The entrance hall, the dungeon laboratory, the bridge and clock tower and climactic stairway to Dracula's chamber, each set the scene with a distinctive spatial layout as much as with visuals and music. This idea might seem elementary for level design in general, but it's elementary because it was so forcefully and masterfully established by Castlevania, which did it better in 1986 than most games have since.

About those visuals and music: They are the coolest thing about Castlevania, as superficial as that may seem. People love to talk about how great Symphony of the Night looks, and they aren't wrong, but the original Castlevania looks incomparably cooler. I do not care that it's an NES game, nor that it's from when people were still figuring out how to make NES games. There isn't a look more perfectly suited to the system and era than Castlevania's grimy gothic Universal/Hammer/Vampire Hunter D pastiche, and the game nails it from the opening cutscene. Like a nasty old B-movie, if it looked any better, it would look a lot worse. (The Forbidden Forest games on the C64 are another great example of this phenomenon.) As the first level progresses through the crumbling castle façade into a once-opulent hall with tattered curtains and cracked plaster, it's clear that the people who made this get it – but the awesomely nocturnal "Vampire Killer" theme ensures that there isn't an atom of doubt before the player even steps inside. And the atmosphere never lets up. Every place in Dracula's time-ravaged castle is falling apart or grown over with ivy, rendered in the luridly saturated palette of a horror movie poster, and home to some classic monster to spam with holy water. The music, by Kinuyo Yamashita and Satoe Terashima, follows "Vampire Killer" with one hit after another, themes that the series would perenially return to despite minimal further involvement from the shamefully uncredited composers. (The creditless credits sequence, a farcical reference to the game's cinematic inspirations, is a real dick move even for the time, when Japanese games had already begun including actual credits.) The slinking "Stalker" and "Walking on the Edge", the urgent "Wicked Child" and "Out of Time", the dramatic "Heart of Fire" and baroque boss themes "Poison Mind" and "Nightmare" – Castlevania's music is all here right at the beginning, whether in the recurring songs themselves or in the sounds and moods that later ones would consistently employ.

So that's Castlevania, and that's unfortunately all of Castlevania. A good player can beat it in about 20 minutes even if they take their time and die now and then. There just isn't a lot of game in this game, a situation worsened by the comparatively weak final level. While not bad in their own right, the flat bridge and cramped clock tower are alternately trivial and tiresome by the standards of everything prior; it's fortunate at least that they're the castle's most visually arresting areas and lead directly into the grand showdown with the Count. The stairways, which are only accessible from the ends and prevent Simon from jumping or using his special weapons, also have obvious room for improvement. The levels are designed well enough around them that their associated difficulty is more strategic than cheap, and they serve a clear purpose in setting unambiguous transition points between the "layers" of each level – but with later games for comparison, it would be denial to say that their contrivance here is ideal.

This game is tight and focused, but it leaves me wanting more. Is it skimpy, or is it short and sweet? If it had just one more level somewhere (an armory, perhaps? a courtyard garden?), I would say the latter without hesitation. But I do hesitate.

8/10

User avatar
Stalvern
Posts: 2553
Joined: June 18th, 2016, 7:15 pm

Re: Castlevania series (1986-1995)

Postby Stalvern » December 12th, 2025, 1:29 pm

Image

Vampire Killer (1986)

Vampire Killer is often treated like an MSX2 release of Castlevania, and it might have started development as such, but it's really just a different game. This is a non-linear action adventure of the sort popular on computers at the time – games like Below the Root and Doriath might be familiar to the C64 Critic, and Dizzy would be a massive British hit on the ZX Spectrum the next year. In this game, each level is transformed into a rather larger multi-directional labyrinth in which Simon Belmont has to find a key before exiting, which necessitates a lot of hunting around for treasure chests and keys to unlock those chests. There are unusual new items like boots that let you move faster and wings that let you jump higher (unlike the Metroidvanias, this game does not require movement upgrades for progress), and you can buy items and weapons from merchants with hearts. Each stage has a map to be found somewhere within it, a welcome surprise for the period.

Normally, this kind of thing is right up my alley, and the games that I mentioned earlier are favorites of mine, but Vampire Killer just feels like busywork. Since the castle is still split into discrete levels, it's missing the sense of space and possibility that games like this thrive on, and doing the same blind scavenger hunt in each level becomes a chore. On top of that, Simon himself has some noticeable changes. There's something off about his jumping, and his formerly hefty whip crack is now a one-frame slash like Ryu Hayabusa's sword in Ninja Gaiden, a necessity in that game that feels cheap and trivial here. Without even the satisfying feel of Castlevania's moment-to-moment gameplay to carry me along, I lost interest in Vampire Killer somewhere in the third level (my favorite level in Castlevania) and did not finish it.

Graphically, it's a mixed bag. Some of the graphics are recolored from Castlevania's, while others are completely new. The overall style is detailed and muted, which suits the more deliberate and cerebral gameplay, but for every highlight like the spiffed-up level 3 and the dungeon lab's shift from blue to brown, there are misfires like the washed-out entrance hall and the dreary new blue-and-gray level 4. (And the staircase leading to Dracula's chamber, an area expanded here into a very drab seventh level, is an absolute joke compared to the one in Castlevania. Does the gigantic new portrait on Drac's wall make up for it?) Still, on balance, Vampire Killer holds its own visually, and, like its non-linear gameplay, its downbeat aesthetics seem to have influenced Simon's Quest. This more serious version of the castle doesn't come close to supplanting Castlevania's pulp phantasmagoria in my mind, but it also cannot be dismissed.

And that's how I feel about the game overall. Despite its failure to appeal to me, I can't just write off Vampire Killer as a bad game. It's an interesting take on Castlevania, one that I assume was born from the difficulty of getting the MSX2 to scroll smoothly – if Vampire Killer has to flip back and forth between static screens, why not make the most of it like other computer games? While I don't think that this style of gameplay works well when grafted onto Castlevania, Vampire Killer has a significant following that disagrees, and the game is different enough from both Castlevania and comparable action adventures that I can see the appeal of its unique approach. If nothing else, Vampire Killer certainly feels like a more substantial undertaking.

6/10

User avatar
LoganRuckman
Posts: 786
Joined: April 10th, 2015, 1:04 am

Re: Castlevania series (1986-1995)

Postby LoganRuckman » December 13th, 2025, 4:18 am

Very good reviews! Can't wait to see your Castlevania III review.

GStratos
Posts: 233
Joined: May 19th, 2024, 2:46 am

Re: Castlevania series (1986-1995)

Postby GStratos » December 14th, 2025, 5:37 am

Very nice reviews, with a unique perspective to them. In my case, I never liked the Castlevania games, with the exception of Rondo of Blood, but it's always cool to see people describe the games they treasure so much.

User avatar
DrLitch
Posts: 1320
Joined: July 19th, 2017, 12:57 pm

Re: Castlevania series (1986-1995)

Postby DrLitch » December 14th, 2025, 1:53 pm

Good reviews and contribution for a series that basically got me big time hooked into gaming. I have never played Vampire Killer and yours was a welcome contribution into a game on an obscure system that I know little about. Look forward to your thoughts on the RPG lite Castlevania II and the third which is, for some people, the series at it's peak.

User avatar
Stalvern
Posts: 2553
Joined: June 18th, 2016, 7:15 pm

Re: Castlevania series (1986-1995)

Postby Stalvern » December 14th, 2025, 2:45 pm

DrLitch wrote:Look forward to your thoughts on the RPG lite Castlevania II

The forums randomly logged me out before I tried to preview that review and deleted the whole thing. It would have been up this morning. I've been struggling to get a rewrite together that doesn't just feel like a worse version of what I half-remember. Going to take a break before having another crack at it.

Thank you for the appreciation of what I have so far. Yours means a lot to me when it comes to this series.

User avatar
DrLitch
Posts: 1320
Joined: July 19th, 2017, 12:57 pm

Re: Castlevania series (1986-1995)

Postby DrLitch » December 14th, 2025, 7:29 pm

Stalvern wrote:The forums randomly logged me out before I tried to preview that review and deleted the whole thing.


Not a bad skill to have to be able to stream from your consciousness a coherently written piece in the hour or two you are logged onto the forum. The artist deemed the self the brush holds.

Look forward to you following up on your reviews.


Return to “Reader Reviews”