The Video Game Critic

[QUOTE=Vexer]ptdebate-You can't tell someone what they "should" or "should not" like, i'm sorry if I don't find dying dozens of times to be very fun, and not "screwing up" the second time is WAY easier said then done.  For many people the marketing absolutely is the reality(Angry Joe for example got his ass kicked pretty brutally by Dark Souls 2, which is probably why he never reviewed it), the learning curve for that game is just too sharp for my tastes, sorry but you simply can't expect everyone to like the game as much as you do.[/QUOTE]
He's not telling you you should like it as in "YOU NEED TO LIKE THIS GAME OR YOU NEED TO DIE", get over yourself. He's telling you that the game would most likely fit what you want in a game.

Should has more than one meaning.

You scolding people is a total let down vexer. Try a new approach dudebro, cause what you've been doin' for the past few months is bodaciously lame.

On topic I'm jaded too. I keep looking for the next Fallout 3 or New Vegas and it ain't out there. I could dig Rush N Attack (NES) without needing it to be as radical as Super Mario Bros, but my standards are way up and my patience is way low now. Part of that is the time dump involved in suffering through the story, the other part is learning the controls.

[QUOTE=Vexer]ptdebate-You can't tell someone what they "should" or "should not" like[/QUOTE]Chill, kiddo. It's just the way he worded it. No big deal.