Did you prefer the regional games diversity or the now global industry?
Posted: July 13th, 2016, 3:37 am
I've just finished reading an article on Japanese gaming, which left me wondering how wonderfully diverse gaming systems were during the 1980's in different regions
Japan: MSX, Famicom, X68000, FM Towns, FM-7 and other Japanese only home computers.
America: Atari, Colecovision, video game crash, TI-99, Apple 2, the NES phenomenon.
Europe: Spectrum, C64, Amstrad, ST, Amiga the Master System.
Just looking at that quick not in depth look at the leading systems of each region is fascinating.
The global market is probably objectively better. Everyone has access to the same systems and games making games more commercially viable, but it sure ain't as interesting.
Japan: MSX, Famicom, X68000, FM Towns, FM-7 and other Japanese only home computers.
America: Atari, Colecovision, video game crash, TI-99, Apple 2, the NES phenomenon.
Europe: Spectrum, C64, Amstrad, ST, Amiga the Master System.
Just looking at that quick not in depth look at the leading systems of each region is fascinating.
The global market is probably objectively better. Everyone has access to the same systems and games making games more commercially viable, but it sure ain't as interesting.