Page 2 of 2

Crap Movies=Crap Movies or Vice-Versa

Posted: January 1st, 2007, 6:18 pm
by sega saturn x

[QUOTE=Crevalle]I still think it was ridiculous that Gamespot gave Riddick a 9.3 -- what a joke.  I personally thought the game sucked.  It got a higher score than Doom 3 and HL2. 
[/QUOTE]

That's because it's a better game than doom 3, HL2 well I can't explain that one.  Also the list of movies that are good is lolz.


Crap Movies=Crap Movies or Vice-Versa

Posted: January 1st, 2007, 8:19 pm
by Shawn

I played Riddick. I'm sorry, in my opinion it is very overrated. Good game but not great. I hated getting far into the story and then having to backtrack all of the time. It just seemed tedious. You can get it cheap now so it is surely worth a look. I like FPS a ton so naturally I thought Doom 3 was much better. I finised Doom 3 but gave up about 1/2 way through Riddick; it just couldn't hold my interest.


Crap Movies=Crap Movies or Vice-Versa

Posted: January 1st, 2007, 8:25 pm
by Crevalle
[QUOTE=sega saturn x]

[QUOTE=Crevalle]I still think it was ridiculous that Gamespot gave Riddick a 9.3 -- what a joke.  I personally thought the game sucked.  It got a higher score than Doom 3 and HL2. 
[/QUOTE]

That's because it's a better game than doom 3, HL2 well I can't explain that one

[/QUOTE]

No, you can't, because that statement was pure idiocy.  I'm sorry, but I can't even take you seriously with comments like that.  Even Gamespot said they gave it higher marks due to the fact that movie-games usually suck, and they didn't think CoR did at all.  That rationale also, IMO, is lame--it creates an uneven playing field for ratings.

Crap Movies=Crap Movies or Vice-Versa

Posted: January 1st, 2007, 10:39 pm
by sega saturn x
[QUOTE=Crevalle][QUOTE=sega saturn x]

[QUOTE=Crevalle]I still think it was ridiculous that Gamespot gave Riddick a 9.3 -- what a joke.  I personally thought the game sucked.  It got a higher score than Doom 3 and HL2. 
[/QUOTE]

That's because it's a better game than doom 3, HL2 well I can't explain that one

[/QUOTE]

No, you can't, because that statement was pure idiocy.  I'm sorry, but I can't even take you seriously with comments like that.  Even Gamespot said they gave it higher marks due to the fact that movie-games usually suck, and they didn't think CoR did at all.  That rationale also, IMO, is lame--it creates an uneven playing field for ratings.
[/QUOTE]

Oh darn you don't take my opinions seriously.  I can't speak for gamespot nor do I really take their grades with anything stronger than a grain of salt.  However I thought doom 3 sucked, it was a dull and dark cramped FPS, it wasn't scary and games that are all dark all them time can eat me.  I haven't liked any of the games that used the unreal engine, and now that I have superb shooters like fear I have no need to give them another shot.  Riddick was a great game, the only problem with it was the lack of a map.

 

Comparing riddick to doom 3 and HL2 (which you did not me) is stupid in the first place.  Since they are nothing alike.  So in summation it was a good game regardless of how it stacked up to games that only shair it's point of view, doom 3 still sucks.