Should Gamespot review old games?

General and high profile video game topics.
m0zart1
Posts: 3117
Joined: December 31st, 1969, 7:00 pm

Should Gamespot review old games?

Postby m0zart1 » January 24th, 2007, 5:37 pm

[QUOTE=Anayo]I see where you're going, but I can see some holes in your reasoning. I think if someone can't appreciate a classic game, then the problem lies with that person, not the high tech stuff they were brought up with. Case in point; I'm only about sixteen years old, not even enough to have been alive during the Atari era, but despite this I love games like Asteroids, Missile Command, Battlezone, and Pac Man. They're just good games. They have ingenious and addictive gameplay. Someone disliking old games for being old is like someone disliking an old film because it's in black and white, or because it doesn't have any CG-special effects. It's dumb and tasteless.
[/QUOTE]

 

Well I largely agree with you.  I was just trying to think through their reasoning, not so much my own.  I am sure Gamespot thinks they have a good reason for going in that direction.

 

One thing that really bothers me -- and I realize that this is due to some interpolation on my part -- is that in one of those reviews of the original NES game on the VC, they lambasted it for not being as good as the original arcade game.  But I guarantee you if the original arcade game appeared on the VC in perfect emulation, they would complain that the arcade game was never that great to begin with.


Atarifever1
Posts: 3892
Joined: December 31st, 1969, 7:00 pm

Should Gamespot review old games?

Postby Atarifever1 » January 24th, 2007, 5:47 pm

[QUOTE=m0zart]

 

One thing that really bothers me -- and I realize that this is due to some interpolation on my part -- is that in one of those reviews of the original NES game on the VC, they lambasted it for not being as good as the original arcade game.  But I guarantee you if the original arcade game appeared on the VC in perfect emulation, they would complain that the arcade game was never that great to begin with.

[/QUOTE]
Well like you said, Donkey gets a very bad score for missing a board from the arcade game leaving it at 3 boards (putting it at something like 4.3 if I remember), then this game has all four boards and it still only manages a 4.9.  Very good emulation of a great arcade game with all the levels intact, and it still only outdoes a game missing an entire 1/4th of the boards by something like 6%?  What? 

a1
Posts: 3032
Joined: December 31st, 1969, 7:00 pm

Should Gamespot review old games?

Postby a1 » January 24th, 2007, 6:35 pm

The sound doesn't hold up!? What does he expect? "God! It's not even orchestrated. Lame." Someone needs to explain to this guy that the graphics and sound possible today, were not possible when these games were made. They need to be graded purely on fun factor.


chrisbid1
Posts: 941
Joined: December 31st, 1969, 7:00 pm

Should Gamespot review old games?

Postby chrisbid1 » January 24th, 2007, 6:44 pm

thats a symptom of 100 point grading scales, there is no logic or reasoning to review scores with a range that wide

Funkmaster V

Should Gamespot review old games?

Postby Funkmaster V » January 25th, 2007, 5:43 am

I was shocked they were reviewing classic games anyway. But releasing Soccer and the NES version of Donkey Kong amoung some of the others that have not aged well at all is really lame of Nintendo.

 

I think Nintendo should get a slap on the wrist for this. I mean, come on... we know you are saving games like "Earthbound" for when there is a Wii software shortage, but lets cut through the poo already. There are enough great Genesis, Turbographix, NES, and SNES games to last us a long long time without having to sift through Altered Beast and Baseball.

 

Funkmaster V

 

 


Alienblue

Should Gamespot review old games?

Postby Alienblue » January 25th, 2007, 12:26 pm

...I can't get on Gamespot, but this is why- save for Nintendo Power- I shiver at most magazine reviews of classic games.

That's why I'm glad that there's sites like VGC, who review games COMPARED TO OTHERS FOR THAT SYSTEM... comparing Odyssey2 Demon Attack to Genesis Thunderforce 3 is obviously stupid.

Sometimes I am in the mood for a mordern game like Toca3 or Princess Peach, other times I want to play LADYBUG or DONKEY KONG. I think even those who were born much later than I could look on the classics as "quick fix" , fun short games, while we oldsters can keep going for the high score on MARIO BROS.!

Atarifever1
Posts: 3892
Joined: December 31st, 1969, 7:00 pm

Should Gamespot review old games?

Postby Atarifever1 » January 25th, 2007, 1:53 pm

[QUOTE=Alienblue]

Sometimes I am in the mood for a mordern game like Toca3 or Princess Peach, other times I want to play LADYBUG or DONKEY KONG. I think even those who were born much later than I could look on the classics as "quick fix" , fun short games
[/QUOTE]
Exactly.  No one is saying that Gears of War and Donkey Kong are the same thing.  However, for what they do, they are great games.  No, there aren't more than 4 boards in DK Jr., but the last I checked, I didn't chase the high score in Halo 2.  To say Halo 2 sucks because I don't get a point for every Jackle I kill, is to miss the point of the game.  They're doing the same thing here.

I refuse to believe that, say, Mario Bros. had people lining up to dump quarters for a few minutes of play, but that those people were in the wrong, and the game is actually unplayable.  Those people had fun.  Not fun prime, fun in quotation marks, semi-fun, or something else.  Those people simply had fun.  I don't think those people were so different, or so stupid, that they're reaction of having fun was wrong, or that somehow the human brain and console hardware have evolved at the exact same speed, so that the people of today could not also find the same fun in there. 

Gaiden

Should Gamespot review old games?

Postby Gaiden » January 25th, 2007, 9:35 pm

I think that the popularity of flash games on the internet and the battles for top scores shows that classic video games could still be very popular.  When you start battling other people for high scores, it gets pretty intense and makes you practice the game over and over again to learn a little more and pick up a few more points.  It would be cool (and maybe they already have it) if Nintendo had high score leader boards for the classic point based games.

bluemonkey1
Posts: 2444
Joined: December 31st, 1969, 7:00 pm

Should Gamespot review old games?

Postby bluemonkey1 » January 26th, 2007, 3:27 am

Except that the Wii VC games don't have online scoreboards, unlike the XBLA ones.



Return to “Video Games General”