Sony Cuts PSP Price...

Roperious1 · Postby **Roperious1** » April 12th, 2007, 9:53 pm

That makes about sense, Futureshop sells them on average for 49.99 Canadian

wur1 · Postby **wur1** » April 12th, 2007, 11:50 pm

You can get used PSP games for $15 at EB--good ones, too, eg the Capcom collections and Syphon Filter. I saw a used Mario 64 DS for $25 recently, which is just unacceptible. The DS doesn't even have a "greatest hits" program, to boot.

Paul Campbell · Postby **Paul Campbell** » April 13th, 2007, 10:35 am

[QUOTE=wur] I saw a used Mario 64 DS for $25 recently, which is just unacceptible.
[/QUOTE]

New or used? If new, why is that unacceptable?

The Suit · Postby **The Suit** » April 14th, 2007, 10:12 am

[QUOTE=Paul Campbell][QUOTE=wur] I saw a used Mario 64 DS for $25 recently, which is just unacceptible.
[/QUOTE]

New or used? If new, why is that unacceptable?
[/QUOTE]

Maybe b/c the game is 12 years old! Do yourself a favor Wur, don't say anything bad about Nintendo on the VGC Nintendo Love Site.

Steerforth · Postby **Steerforth** » April 14th, 2007, 1:09 pm

^ Lol ^

Atarifever1 · Postby **Atarifever1** » April 14th, 2007, 1:22 pm

[QUOTE=The Suit]

[QUOTE=Paul Campbell][QUOTE=wur] I saw a used Mario 64 DS for $25 recently, which is just unacceptible.
[/QUOTE]

New or used? If new, why is that unacceptable?
[/QUOTE]

Maybe b/c the game is 12 years old! Do yourself a favor Wur, don't say anything bad about Nintendo on the VGC Nintendo Love Site.
[/QUOTE]
Go away. I'm not going to even add any reasoning to this one, because I am tired of explaining to you why you are wrong.

I'm not even disagreeing over the 12 year old games part, as I hate all games from that generation and think $10 is too much for the entire combined N64 and PS libraries when they were new.

Leo Ames · Postby **Leo Ames** » April 14th, 2007, 8:46 pm

If you can't find at least one good game from that generation, I hardly can even consider you a videogame fan.

Atarifever1 · Postby **Atarifever1** » April 14th, 2007, 9:59 pm

[QUOTE=Leo Ames]

If you can't find at least one good game from that generation, I hardly can even consider you a videogame fan.

[/QUOTE]

Well get busy hardly considering then.

m0zart1 · Postby **m0zart1** » April 14th, 2007, 10:02 pm

[QUOTE=Atarifever][QUOTE=Leo Ames]

If you can't find at least one good game from that generation, I hardly can even consider you a videogame fan.

[/QUOTE]

Well get busy hardly considering then.

[/QUOTE]

Well I won't criticize you in the same fashion. I mean we all like what we like, right? But I have to admit, given that that generation was so magical for me, I have to wonder why you didn't like it much. It was the generation that taught me to love 3D gaming, after all.

Come to think of it, there isn't a gaming generation I didn't find magical at the time, and I've seen them all. So maybe my perspective isn't worth all that much.

Atarifever1 · Postby **Atarifever1** » April 14th, 2007, 10:17 pm

[QUOTE=m0zart]Well I won't criticize you in the same fashion. I mean we all like what we like, right? But I have to admit, given that that generation was so magical for me, I have to wonder why you didn't like it much. It was the generation that taught me to love 3D gaming, after all.

[/QUOTE]

I think the generation, nearly as a whole with some, usually, Saturn exceptions, was a huge step backwards graphically and gameplay wise. We went from beautiful 16 bit games like Gunstar Heroes, Rocket Knight Adventures, Sonic 3 & Knuckles, Comix Zone, Link's Awakening, Super Mario World, Soldier Blade, R-Type, Metal Slug, King of Fighters, etc. to junky muddy eyesores. We went from great shoot em ups to 3D shooters where you spent all day flying in cirles blasting boring polygons into a set of boring polygons. We went from platformers that were so refined they were nearly flawless, to fighting with the camera just to see the freaking game. I suppose if I were more of an FPS fan I'd call it an alright generation, but that is something I am not.